Introduction
The topic of discussion in this presentation is
interactive videoconferencing (IV). Interactive Videoconferencing is an
effective tool that may be used in distance education settings. This system can
be integrated into the distance education program with minimal adaptation to
the curriculum and course and is designed to support two-way video and audio
communication between multiple locations (Gottschalk, 2006) . IV is an effective
tool to be incorporated into the K-12 curriculum. It is an effective means to continue
educational services delivered to students who can not be in the traditional
face 2 face (f2f) setting. It can also
be implemented within the traditional setting as an enhancement tool. Student who participate within the IV setting
have assess to other students and curriculums. This allows for greater
opportunities of collaboration.
Significance of Interactive Videoconferencing
There are multiple reasons
for using interactive videoconferencing.
These reasons include but are not limited to the following:
·
Addressing individual
differences
·
Improved learning
·
Equity
·
Increased
access to opportunity
·
Preparation
for the Future (K-12 Videoconferencing, 2002) .
Fourth Wave and Interactive Videoconferencing
Traditional learning
environments are no longer effective for preparing students for a world of interactive communication and high speed
technology. Educators must come up with
new ways to incorporate the best practices of the past into a world of
connectivity. This incorporation starts
on an elementary level and will become a permanent skill to be mastered.
Rationale
Students must begin early to
prepare for a world of technology and communication. The intention behind this
presentation is to inform the viewer of the importance of implementing
interactive videoconferencing within the public school K-12 curriculum. Collaboration, technology integration and
increasing the access to opportunity is the rationale behind incorporating IV. IV provides learning opportunities to
non-traditional groups, including those in geographically remote areas or those
unable to gain access to learning due to time and location rigidities inherent
within traditional tertiary education courses or family commitments (Canning,
1999).
The Team
·
The
Originating Teacher
·
Technical
Support Person
·
Curriculum
Planner/ Coordinator
·
Clerical
Support
·
Principal/Assistant
Principal/Technology Administration
Conclusion
Interactive
videoconferencing will benefit students in K-12 for the reason that it addresses
individual differences, it improves learning, it promotes equity and lessons
the gap of the disadvantaged, it increases opportunity for student and
instructor and it prepares students for the future.
References:
Canning, R. (1999). The use of videoconferencing for
continuing personal and professional development in Higher Education: a
small–group study. Journal of Further and Higher Education , 117-130.
Gottschalk, T. H.
(2006, May 14). Distance Education at a Glance Home. Retrieved December
18, 2011, from Engineering Outreach Home:
http://www.uiweb.uidaho.edu/eo/dist10.html
K-12
Videoconferencing. (2002). Retrieved
January 15, 2012, from Distance Education at a Glance: http://www.netc.org/digitalbridges/uses/
You picked a very interesting topic. I am looking forward to seeing the final product. Is there any research on its effectiveness? Will you show a video of how it works? I would be interested in seeing that.
ReplyDelete